top of page
Mitsubishi Outlander_edited.jpg

PRACTICAL PLANET SAVING

I’ve never met a soul who wished for the end of our planet and I’ll bet you haven’t either. So why aren’t we all driving electric vehicles? The political class currently occupying DC and California insist that we should abandon petrol ASAP and plug in for a brighter future. More than a few of these elected and appointed leaders compose EV regulations while their drivers fire up their big petrol-powered SUVs a bit early so their departure is nicely comfortable.

​

Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy driving new electric vehicles. They’re quiet, quick and often less expensive to fuel up than gasoline counterparts, especially if you have a 220/240 EV charger in your garage. And if you have solar on your roof, most of your fuel is free. For many, lucky enough to own a single-family dwelling in a sunny climate, the benefits offset the much higher price of an electric vehicle. That still leaves a good chunk of the American public out of this rosy picture.

The political class and EV evangelists counter that fast charging is getting nearly as convenient as a pit stop at the local gas station. Sorry, just not true. A high-speed Level 3 charger that can output 350kW of direct current (DC) is not easy to locate and few of the current crop of electric vehicles can accept that rapid a charge. For those pricy EVs that can, a 15-minute “fill-up” is possible, as long as it’s a nice mild day out. But if that’s the only way you charge the battery, you’ll shorten its life. And that battery replacement is about 12-grand, not the 100-buck parts store visit.

I don’t wish to bum readers out on an EV future. It’s not at all gloomy, unless we continue to rush headlong into pure battery electric power and leave many of our countrymen stuck without the freedom of mobility. The good news is that our entire vehicle fleet is becoming much more fuel efficient. My family vehicle is a reasonably sized, well equipped Mercedes GLC-300 that averages high 20’s low 30’s miles-per-gallon fuel efficiency. That’s about the same MPG as our MINI Cooper coupe used to average.

Mitsubishi_OutlanderPHEV_Selects-9-1200x778_edited.jpg
MitsubishiOutlanderPHEV_CockpitDriverHigh-1200x800_edited.jpg

Then there’s hybrid gas/electric power choices available where the initial cost has come way down and you have even better fuel efficiency, especially around town, along with long range for trips and abundant quick fill-up opportunities. And a relatively new entrant in the market is the plug-in hybrid (PHEV) which in my view should become a natural step to pure battery electric vehicles.

Many early PHEVs were “compliance vehicles” with just enough electric range at lower speeds to get into mostly European cities that required EV operation. But that’s changed. I recently spent a week in Mitsubishi’s Outlander PHEV, an SUV big enough to haul seven passengers in nice style with good performance. Its window sticker displays 64-MPG in gas/electric mode. I drove all over the island on electric power and made a run to Jacksonville when the engine finally started. The result was 73.6-MPG for a week of normal driving. That’s the kind of transition to a battery-only future we can live with.

THE FINE PRINT

2023 Mitsubishi Outlander SEL Premium

TYPE:  Front-engine, all-wheel-drive

ENGINE:  2.4-liter Turbo & I-4

HORSEPOWER:  248 @ 5,000 RPM

TORQUE:  332 lb.ft. @ 1,300 – 4,500 RPM

BASE PRICE: $48,145

AS TESTED:  $52,200

FUEL CONSUMPTION:  25-city, 27-highway, 26-combined

For some of us who’ve been around the automotive industry for more than a handful of decades, the term “muscle car” was popularized in the 1960s era of American automakers stuffing big V8 engines into coupes, sedans and a few convertibles. Fast forward to today’s market and, at least for the moment, the only former “Big Three” automaker stuffing snorting V8 engines into passenger cars is Ford. But this hardly means that petrol powered bragging rights are the sole province of the fellas in Dearborn, Michigan.

First a short history lesson. The Dodge brothers built their first car in 1914 and in 1928 their company was acquired by Chrysler. In 1998 the iconic American automaker joined Mercedes-Benz parent to create DaimlerChrysler Motors, an alleged “Merger of Equals”. In 2007 Cerberus Capital Management took control and along with a weak economy, steered the automaker into further distress. After a short restructuring, Fiat acquired a majority stake in Chrysler Corp and in 2014 renamed the automaker to FCA US LLC. Finally in 2021, Fiat and the French PSA Group joined to become Stellantis N.V. with headquarters in Hoofddorp, North Holland.

​

I share this very condensed history to enable readers to grasp how challenging it has been for the Dodge product planners to get really competitive cars to market. Today’s Charger is a great example. After successfully positioning Dodge as a provider of rip-snorting, thunderous performance vehicles, the Netherlands-based Stellantis decided that electricity was the best propulsion system for the Dodge Charger. They might have asked Harley Davidson how sales of their battery-powered motorcycle were doing but wasn’t the car business pivoting to plugs? So 2025 was not a banner year for electric Chargers.

​

This year Chargers are literally roaring back and while not “yet” with HEMI V8 power, the 3.0-liter, twin-turbo, six-cylinder engine offerings are compelling. Charger’s standard offering produces 420 HP with a deep growl out the twin exhaust pipes. Not enough to make your right foot happy? Option the high-output version and 550 HP is on tap, plenty enough to take on most V8s. And early buyers could acquire a Super Bee Launch Edition with 600 HP and that high-octane bee on the fenders. Sadly, they didn’t send me that version.

​

Today’s Dodge fellas position the Daytona as a muscle car rivaling Ford’s Mustang and when applied to the two-door coupe version, that’s fair. But I found this good-looking, well-equipped four-door sports sedan a reasonable rival to a few luxury brands. If you want a GM competitor, it’s Cadillac’s CT5 V, a quite nice sports sedan but you’ll give up 100 HP and some interior space. BMW’s 540i xDrive and the Mercedes-Benz E 450 4MATIC also offer smooth power and handling, but you’ll spend luxury money to sit in those heated seats.

 

Our Dodge didn’t really rival luxury brands in the elevated detail of materials and precision but our Charger continued to impress me with a long list of attributes that are not often found in high-volume models. And the handling characteristics are quite good for a full-size sedan that adds even more utility with a big rear hatch opening and folding rear seats. The new Charger is a welcome offering in today’s utilitarian marketplace.

Dodge Charger Rear_edited.jpg
Dodge Charger Interior_edited.jpg

THE FINE PRINT

2026 Dodge Charger R/T Plus

TYPE:  Front Engine, all-wheel-drive

ENGINE:  3.0 -liter twin-turbo I-6

HORSEPOWER:  420 @ 5,200 RPM

TORQUE:  469 lb.ft. @ 3,500 RPM

BASE PRICE: $51,995

AS TESTED:  $65,365

FUEL CONSUMPTION:  

17-city, 26-highway, 20-combined

bottom of page